Social Science Journal ›› 2016 ›› Issue (5): 15-20.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

  

  • Published:2018-07-26

CLC Number: 

  • C913
〔1〕哈贝马斯:《公共领域里的宗教:宗教公民与世俗公民的“公共理性运用”诸认知预设》,张庆熊、林子淳编:《哈贝马斯的宗教观及其反思》,上海:上海三联书店,2011年,第48页。
〔2〕〔3〕 〔4〕〔5〕 〔6〕 〔9〕 〔26〕 罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,南京:译林出版社,2000年,第3、236-237、227-228、230、262、238-239、20-22页。
〔7〕 〔20〕 罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,南京:译林出版社,2000年,导论,第39、41页。
〔8〕〔16〕〔17〕罗尔斯:《公共理性理念新探》,谭安奎编:《公共理性》,杭州:浙江大学出版社,2011年,第136-137、130、148页。
〔10〕K. Greenawalt,“On Public Reason,”Chicago-Kent Law Review,vol.69,no.3(April 1994),p.681.
〔11〕桑德尔:《自由主义与正义的局限》,南京:译林出版社,2001年,第250-251页。
〔12〕〔14〕〔24〕D. Reidy,“Rawls’s Wide View of Public Reason:Not Wide Enough,”Res Publica,vol.6,no.1(January 2000),pp.64-68,68-70,70-71.
〔13〕Fred M. Frohock,“The Boundaries of Public Reason,”The American Political Science Review,vol.91,no.4(December 1997),pp.836-837.
〔15〕〔18〕P. Neal,“Is Political Liberalism hostile to Religion?”in Shaun P. Younged,Reflections on Rawls:an Assessment of His Legacy,Burlington:Ashgate,2009,pp.160,161-162.
〔19〕J. Quong,Public Reason,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/public-reason/,2016-06-02
〔21〕〔22〕〔23〕〔25〕Andrew Williams,“The Alleged Incompleteness of Public Reason,”Res Publica,vol.6,no.2(May 2000),pp.204,205-206,206-208,210.
〔27〕J. Horton,Rawls,“Public Reason and the Limits of Liberal Justification,”Contemporary Political Theory,vol. 2,no.1(March 2003),p.20.
[1] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2018, 0(5): 55-62.
[2] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2018, 0(5): 63-69.
[3] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2018, 0(5): 70-76.
[4] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2018, 0(5): 77-84.
[5] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2018, 0(5): 85-91.
[6] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2015, 0(5): 54-59.
[7] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2013, 0(5): 41-45.
[8] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2013, 0(5): 46-50.
[9] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2013, 0(5): 51-56.
[10] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2012, 0(6): 49-53.
[11] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2012, 0(6): 64-67.
[12] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2012, 0(6): 80-83.
[13] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2012, 0(5): 58-64.
[14] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2005, 0(6): 48-50.
[15] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2005, 0(6): 58-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 5 -16 .
[2] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 21 -29 .
[3] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 30 -41 .
[4] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 42 -50 .
[5] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 51 -59 .
[6] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 60 -65 .
[7] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 66 -72 .
[8] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 73 -78 .
[9] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 79 -86 .
[10] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 87 -92 .