社会科学辑刊 ›› 2011 ›› Issue (3): 72-76.

• 演化经济学的研究与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

论演化经济学与博弈论的关系

黄凯南   

  • 出版日期:2011-06-20 发布日期:2019-01-18
  • 作者简介:黄凯南,1979年生,经济学博士,山东大学经济研究院副教授(山东济南250100)。

  • Online:2011-06-20 Published:2019-01-18

摘要: 演化经济学与博弈论并非是两种不可通约的研究范式,它们长期存在互动与交流。演化博弈论和主观博弈论在演化分析中的作用与局限显示,尽管随着博弈论的发展,经典博弈论的许多假设被放松,博弈论具有更多的演化性质,日益成为演化经济学重要的建模工具,但是,无论是演化博弈论还是主观博弈论都无法解释自身客观博弈形式的演化,博弈论还不能成为演化经济学的基本分析工具。而建构一个融合“变与不变”或“均衡与演化”的理论体系将是未来经济学的理论前沿。

关键词: 演化经济学, 博弈论, 演化博弈论, 主观博弈论

中图分类号: 

  • F011

〔1〕Hodgson,G.M.,& Knudsen,T.,“In Search of General Evolutionary Principles:Why Darwinism is too Important to be Left to the Biologists,”Journal of Bioeconomics,vol.10,no.1(2008),pp.51-69.
〔2〕Binmore,K.,“Game Theory and Institutions,” Working Paper on Economics Department Bristol University, 2009.
〔3〕Gintis,Herbert,“A Framework for the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences,”Behavioral and Brain Sciences,vol.30, (2007),pp.1-61.
〔4〕Vincent,T.L.&Brown,J.S.,Evolutionary Game Theory,Natural Selection,and Darwinian Dynamics, New York:Cambridge University Press,2005.
〔5〕Hamilton,W. D.,“Extraordinary Sex Ratio,”Science,vol.156,(1967),pp.477 -488.
〔6〕〔11〕Maynard SmithJ.,Evolution and the Theory of Games,Cambr:dge:Cambridge University Press,1982.
〔7〕丹尼尔 ?豪斯曼:《经济学的哲学》,北京:人民出版社,2007年。
〔8〕Harsanyi, J.,“Games with Incomplete Information Played by'Bayesian'Players,”Management Sci.,vol.14,no.3(1967),pp.159-182.
〔9〕Weibull,J.W.,Evolutionary Game Theory,Cambridye: MIT Press,1995.
〔10〕Young,H.P.,1998,Individual Strategy and Social Structure:an Evolutionary Theory of Institutions, Princeton:Princeton University Press.
〔12〕Nelson,R.R.& Winter, S.G.,An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change,Cambrige: Belknap Press,1982.
〔13〕Schmidt,Christian,“Are Evolutionary Games another way of thinking about Game Theory?some Historical Considerations,”Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol.14,(2004),pp.249-262.
〔14〕Friedman,D.,“Evolutionary Economics Goes Mainstream:A Review of the Theory of Learning in Games,”Journal of Evolutionary Economics,no.8(1999),pp. 423-432.
〔15〕Witt,Ulrich,“Heuristic Twists and Ontological Creeds-A Road Map for Evolutionary Economics,”Papers on Economics and Evolution,2007,0701,Jena:Max Planck Institute of Economics.
〔16〕Schotter,A.R.,The Economic Theory of Social Institutions,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1981.
〔17〕〔25〕Grief,A.,Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lesions from Medieval Trade,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2006.
〔18〕丁利:《从均衡到均衡:制度变迁的主观博弈框架》,《制度经济学研究》2005年第5期。
〔19〕Kalai,E.,and E. Lehrer,“Subjective Games and Equilibria,”Games and Economic Behavior,vol.61,(1995),pp.1019-1045;Matsushima,H., “Towards a Theory of Subjective Games,”Working paper on Faculty of Economics,University of Tokyo,1998;Aoki,M.,Towards a Comparative Institutional Analysis,Cambridge:MIT Press, 2001;Kaneko,M.,Kline,J.J.,“Inductive Game Theory:a Basic Scenario,”Journal of Mathematical Economics,vol.44,(2008), pp.1332-1363;Hanaki,N.,Ishikawa,R.,Akiyama,E., “Learning Games,”Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control forthcoming,2009
〔20〕Kalai,E.,and E.Lehrer,“Subjective Games and Equilibria,”Games and Economic Behavior,vol.61, (1995),pp.1019-1045;Matsushima,H,“Towards a Theory of Subjective Games”,Working paper on Faculty of Economics,University of Tokyo,1998.
〔21〕Kaneko,M.,Kline,J.J.,“Inductive Game Theory:a Basic Scenario,”Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.44,(2008),pp.1332-1363;Hanaki,N.,Ishikawa, R.,Akiyama,E.,“Learning Games,”Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control forthcoming,2009.
〔22〕Kaneko,M.,Kline, J.J.,“Inductive Game Theory:a Basic Scenario,”Journal of Mathematical Economics,vol.44(2008),pp.1332-1363.
〔23〕 〔24〕Aoki,M.,“Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Changes,” Working paper on World Congress of the International Economic Association in Morocco,2005.
[1] 王曙光, 贾镝. 互联网金融参与主体博弈分析与制度建设[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2016, 0(5): 99-107.
[2] 蒋满元. 政府行为选择对区域经济政策制定与实施的影响探讨--博弈论的分析视角[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2007, 0(3): 157-162.
[3] 程广宇. 交易行为的持续性与信用制度的建立[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2004, 0(1): 155-157.
[4] 句华. 信用经济与政府信用的保障机制[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2003, 0(1): 45-49.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!