Social Science Journal ›› 2017 ›› Issue (6): 21-29.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

  

  • Online:2017-11-15 Published:2018-07-19

CLC Number: 

  • F061.5
〔1〕周起业等:《区域经济学》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1989年,第236-249页.
〔2〕魏后凯:《东北经济的新困境及重振战略思路》,《社会科学辑刊》2017年第1期.
〔3〕李许卡、杨天英、宋雪:《东北老工业基地转型发展研究——一个文献综述》,《经济体制改革》2016年第5期;Hu, X., Hassink, R.,“New Perspectives on Restructuring of Old Industrial Areas in China: A Critical Review and Research Agenda,”Chinese Geographical Science, vol.27,no.1(2017),pp.110-122.
〔4〕Vernon,R.,“International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,”Quarterly Journal of Economics,vol. 80,no.2(1966),pp.190-207.
〔5〕Thompson,J.H.,“Some Theoretical Considerations for Manufacturing Geography,”Economic Geography,vol. 42, no.4(1966),pp.357-358.
〔6〕David,P.A.,“Clio and Economics of QWERTY,”American Economic Review,vol.75,no.2(1985),pp.332-337.
〔7〕Arthur,W.B.,“Competing Technologies,Increasing Returns,and Lock-in by Historical Events,”Economic Journal,vol. 394,no. 99(1989),pp.116-131.
〔8〕Martin,R.,Sunley,P.,“Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution,”Journal of Economic Geography,vol.6,Issue 4(2006),pp. 395-437.
〔9〕Grabher G.,“The Weakness of Strong Ties:the Lock-in of Regional Development in the Ruhr Area,”in Ed. G.Grabher,The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks,New York:Routledge, 1993,pp.255-277;Morgan, K., Nauwelaers,C.,“A Regional Perspective on Innovation: from Theory to Strategy,”in Morgan, Kevin John,Nauwelaers, C. eds.,Regional Innovation Strategies: The Challenge for Less-Favoured Regions,London: The Stationery Office and Regional Studies Association,1999,pp.1-18.
〔10〕Checkland,S.G.,The Upas Tree:Glasgow1875-1975,Glasgow:University of Glasgow Press,1976,p.12,p.48.
〔11〕Hayter,R.,Patchell,J.,“Different Trajectories in the Social Division of Labour: the Cutlery Industry in Sheffield,England and Tsubame,Japan,”Urban Studies,vol.30,no.8(1993),pp.1427-1445.
〔12〕周起业:《西方生产布局学原理》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1987年,第246-258页.
[1] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 5-16.
[2] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 30-41.
[3] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2015, 0(4): 74-84.
[4] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2015, 0(4): 85-93.
[5] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2013, 0(6): 102-111.
[6] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2005, 0(6): 111-113.
[7] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2005, 0(3): 71-75.
[8] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2005, 0(2): 187-189.
[9] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2005, 0(1): 174-176.
[10] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2003, 0(6): 4-9.
[11] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2003, 0(5): 61-66.
[12] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2002, 0(5): 87-92.
[13] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2001, 0(3): 92-96.
[14] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 0, (): 174-176.
[15] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2018, 0(3): 144-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 5 -16 .
[2] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 30 -41 .
[3] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 42 -50 .
[4] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 51 -59 .
[5] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 60 -65 .
[6] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 66 -72 .
[7] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 73 -78 .
[8] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 79 -86 .
[9] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 87 -92 .
[10] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 93 -100 .