摘要： 不同于大陆法系犯罪论体系,基于实用主义的美国刑法理论认为共犯责任主要解决何种情况下行为人需要为他人的犯罪行为承担责任的问题。美国刑法中共犯问题的特征之一是没有区分不同参与人的可责性,而是将共犯责任视为正犯责任的一种“衍生责任”,这就导致美国刑法中的共犯责任在客观方面与主观方面都体现出以司法便宜主义为导向的“泛化”特征。在刑事一体化的视野中,美国刑事程序法与证据法的高度发达使其能够抗制共犯责任有失宽泛所导致的弊端。这种实体法与程序法、证据法的良性互动,满足了打击共同犯罪与保证犯罪嫌疑人基本权利的刑事目标,值得借鉴。
中图分类号:
| 〔1〕Paul H.Robinson,Jane A.Gral,“Element Analysis in Defining Criminal Liability:The MPC and Beyond,” 〔2〕Miguel A.Méndez,“A Sisyphean Task:The Common Law Approach to Mens Rea,” 〔3〕岛田聪一郎:《共犯与正犯的基础理论》,东京:东京大学出版会,2002年,第21页. 〔4〕Michael Heyman,“ Losing All Sense of Just Proportion:The Peculiar Law of Accomplice Liability,” 〔5〕Lisa M.Storm,“Parties to Crime in Texas——Principal or Accomplice,” 〔6〕 The Harvard Law Review Association,“Developments in the Law——Criminal Conspiracy,” 〔7〕Sharon C.Lynch,“Drug Kingpins and Their Helpers:Accomplice Liability under 21 USC Section 848,” 〔8〕Steven Wisotsky,“ Crackdown:The Emerging ‘Drug Exception’ to the Bill of Rights,” 〔9〕Louis Westerfield,“The Mens Rea Requirement of Accomplice Liability in American Criminal Law-Knowledge or Intent,” 〔10〕Stephen R.Munzer,“Persons and Consequences:Observations on Fried’s Right and Wrong,” 〔11〕Tyler B.Robinson,“A Question of Intent:Aiding and Abetting Law and the Rule of Accomplice Liability Under 924(c),” 〔12〕Joshua Dressler,“Reassessing the Theoretical Underpinnings of Accomplice Liability:New Solutions To An Old Problem,” 〔13〕Candace Courteau,“Comment:The Mental Element Required for Accomplice Liability:A Topic Note,La.Law,” 〔14〕Larry M.Lawrence,“ Accomplice Liability:Derivative Responsibility,” 〔15〕〔24〕Sanford H.Kadish,“Complicity,Cause and Blame:A Study in the Interpretation of Doctrine,” 〔16〕〔23〕Tyler B.Robinson,“ A Question of Intent:Aiding and Abetting Law and the Rule of Accomplice Liability under 924(c),” 〔17〕〔18〕〔26〕〔28〕Joshua Dressler,“Reforming Complicity Law:Trivial Assistance as a Lesser Offense?” 〔19〕Michael G.Heyman,“The Natural and Probable Consequences Doctrine:A Case Study in Failed Law Reform,” 〔20〕John F.Decker,“The Mental State Requirement for Accomplice Liability in American Criminal Law,” 〔21〕Peter W.Low,“The MPC,the Common Law,and Mistakes of Fact:Recklessness,Negligence,or Strict Liability?” 〔22〕Joshua Dressler, 〔25〕〔27〕Markus D.Dubber,“Criminalizing Complicity:A Comparative Analysis,” |
| [1] | 阎二鹏. 法教义学视角下帮助行为正犯化的省思——以《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)》为视角[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2016, 0(4): 73-79. |
| [2] | 骆群. 受贿罪刑罚配置发展中的立法思辨[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2016, 0(4): 92-97. |
|