Social Science Journal ›› 2017 ›› Issue (6): 108-112.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

  

  • Online:2017-11-15 Published:2018-07-19

CLC Number: 

  • DF90
〔1〕J. Ashley Roach,Robert W. Smith,Excessive Maritime Claims(3rd Ed),Leiden:Martinus Nijhoff,2012,pp.73-83.
〔2〕〔9〕〔10〕〔11〕〔12〕〔13〕〔14〕〔23〕Judge Dolliver Delson,Coalter Lathrop,“Baselines under the International Law of the Sea,”International Law Association(Sofia Conference),vol.26,(2012),p.2,544,545,546,547,547, 548,548.
〔3〕Report of the Group of Experts on Hydrographic Surveying and Nautical Charting,1978-5-12,http://UNESCO document E/CONF/71/L.1.,2017-3-17.
〔4〕〔24〕Office for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea(United Nations), Baselines:An Examination of the Relevant Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,New York:United Nations,1989,pp.1-5.
〔5〕Victor Prescott, Clive Schofield,The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World(2nd Ed),Leiden:Martinus Nijhoff,2005,P.101.
〔6〕〔7〕David Anderson,Modern Law of the Sea-Selected Essays,Leiden:Martinus Nijhoff,2008, pp.453-454.
〔8〕Lewis M. Alexander,“Baseline Delimitations and Maritime Boundaries,”Virginia Journal of International Law,vol.23,no.4(1983), p.535.
〔15〕伊恩·布朗利:《国际公法原理》,曾令良、余敏友等译,北京:法律出版社,2007年,第13页.
〔16〕〔17〕HF Searles,“ Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Matter of an Arbitration between Guyana and Suriname, ”International Legal Materials,vol.47,(2008),p.396.
〔18〕ICJ,“Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea,”The Reports of International Court of Justice,vol. 659,(2007),p.743.
〔19〕〔20〕ICJ,Maritime delimitation and territorial questions between Qatar and Bahrain, The Reports of International Court of Justice,vol.40,(2001),pp.193-195.
〔21〕ICJ,“Fisheries(United Kingdom v.Norway),”The Reports of International Court of Justice,vol.116, (1951), p.35.
〔22〕Peter Beazley,Technical Considerations in Maritime Boundary Delimitations,in Jonathan I.Charney & Lewis M.Alexander ed.,International Maritime Boundaries, Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1993, pp.243-245.
[1] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 93-100.
[2] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 101-107.
[3] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 113-118.
[4] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 119-125.
[5] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 126-132.
[6] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2016, 0(6): 46-53.
[7] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2015, 0(6): 69-72.
[8] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2015, 0(5): 69-74.
[9] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(5): 105-111.
[10] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(5): 112-117.
[11] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(5): 118-124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 5 -16 .
[2] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 21 -29 .
[3] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 30 -41 .
[4] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 42 -50 .
[5] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 51 -59 .
[6] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 60 -65 .
[7] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 66 -72 .
[8] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 73 -78 .
[9] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 79 -86 .
[10] . [J]. Social Science Journal, 2017, 0(6): 87 -92 .